Follow on Twitter!

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

County Court Money Claims Reforms

A little bit of Northampton forever in Salford

All change in the County Courts for issuing "money" claims

Although widely talked about for some months now within the legal profession, a major change to the County Courts system recently took place, which the vast majority of the public will have no idea about. This relates to the way claims for "money only" in the County Courts are issued and dealt with at the early stages.

No change to Money Claim Online (MCOL)

It is first worth noting that there has been no change to the way claims are processed by the online service Money Claim Online. This service can still be accessed in the normal manner by visiting: -


The online service offers discounts on Court fees and is adequate for most everyday money claims.

Money claims now handled at Salford Business Centre

Since 19 March 2012 any County Court claim, which is for money only (either fixed amount or amount to be decided by the Court) MUST be issued via the new County Court Money Claims Centre in Salford, Greater Manchester. This new business centre will handle all of the early stages of a claim. This includes issuing the claim, taking any defence or admission, and receiving back the Allocation Questionnaire in claims that are defended. Claimants now start a claim by completing a new Form N1 (Claim Form) and sending it to the following address: -

County Court Money Claims Centre
PO BOX 527
SALFORD
M5 0BY

THESE PROCEDURES DO NOT APPLY TO CLAIMS ARISING FROM FAILURE BY LANDLORDS TO PROTECT TENANCY DEPOSITS: - separate procedures apply, please see Blog post below dealing with the protection of tenancy deposits.

You need to send enough copies of your claim for the Court and the Defendant(s). A major change is that Claimants will no longer receive a sealed copy of their claim form back from the Court. So make sure you keep a copy for your own records.

Claimants can find the relevant form here: -


A Claimant is required to nominate a preferred Court for the claim to be transferred to if it is defended; however, this choice is subject to the usual rules concerning transfer of County Court Claims (usually a defended claim will be transferred to a Defendant's local court when the Defendant is an individual).

All money claims now issued in the name of Northampton County Court

When completing the form you enter NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT as the Court of issue. So, under this new system, the paperwork is processed in Salford and issued in the name of Northampton! A little bit of Northampton forever in Salford!

So how is it going?

During the pilot many legal professionals expressed concern that the new procedures would be chaotic. There were many complaints. Personally I have found this new system to work reasonably well. Claims seem to be issued consistently within two working days; far better than the inconsistent practices of the individual court houses! A tip I would give though is to send any paperwork to the business centre by recorded delivery!

Contacting the Court

A new contact centre has been set up to deal with claims issued by the business centre: -

0300 123 1372

Sunday, 6 May 2012

BBC Question Time: - Tips for Appearing in the Audience

How do you get on BBC Question Time as a Member of the Audience?

Every week David Dimbleby will announce the locations for the next round of programmes. He will also give out a telephone number and website address http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question_time/1858613.stm 

The starting point is that you telephone or fill out the online application form. Question Time strives to select an audience, which is "representative". So you fill out the form and what happens next? Well, it is worth taking a look at the odds of being selected. Apparently, some 4000 applications will be received for programmes in the larger cities. Approximately 150 people will be selected. That gives you a 3.75% chance of being selected! Not very good odds you will say! I appeared as an audience member for the London show on 3 May 2012. My application was submitted late night on the prior Monday; i.e. 30 April 2012! Twelve hours later I received a voicemail from Allison Fuller, who is the Audience Producer for the programme, asking that I urgently contact her. Having returned Allison's call she then proceeded to ask me a fair few questions about my political viewpoints, affiliations, and thoughts on contemporary news items. She then asked me what sort of questions I would wish to pose to the panel. One thing I should stress is that it was made clear to me that I was expected to want to ask questions and/or participate in the debate. It seemed to me that the programme is not looking for audience members who are content to just sit there and say nothing. So if that is your intention don't, whatever you do, admit it! After about five minutes chat she told me that I was "in". I was quite pleased, only 14 hours after submitting my application form, I was confirmed on the programme!

What happens next?

An email was then sent confirming the location for that week's recording, arrival time, and security procedures. The email also asks you to submit a question for the panel by return. The question should be short, sharp, and provocative and no more than 30 words (though they prefer less than 20). You are also asked to monitor the news on the day of the programme and  submit a different question on the night whilst waiting to enter the studio.

The night itself!

You arrive at the recording location on the night in question between 17:30 and 18:30. Security takes place and you must produce photographic identification. Refreshments are provided. Whilst in the waiting area the news channels are shown on flat screen televisions for any last minute news items, which may give rise to late questions. You submit your second question and then wait. Around 18:30 David Dimbleby appeared, to welcome everyone and give a briefing on what to expect for the evening.


I have to say that Dimbleby was excellent at putting everyone at ease and generating a good atmosphere in the waiting room.

You then enter the studio. There are no allocated seats so it may well be worth adopting a "strategic" location within the waiting area in order to secure a prime seat in the studio itself! I managed to secure front row and centre. Therefore I considered my strategy in that regard a complete success!

Once in the studio the floor manager introduces himself and again gives a briefing on the do's and don'ts for the evening. At this point he asks for volunteers to form a panel. There then follows a mock debate, which is filmed (but not shown on television) to enable the production team to check camera angles, sound levels, and microphone locations. I was selected as a panel member for this mock debate. If you ever join the Question Time audience then I highly recommend trying to get on the panel for this rehearsal. It is an excellent experience, which you can't buy! Now you are not supposed to take photographs in the studio; however, a few audience members did! The photographs found their way to my inbox the next morning (and no doubt a few other inboxes). Here is the panel for the mock debate!

The question for the debate was: -

"Should the Government be responsible for solving childhood obesity?"

Now your blogger (being of "petite" size NOT) found the question ironic; however, a 20 minute lively debate then followed! My stance was that it was down to personal responsibility and finding time in a busy schedule to exercise. I also pointed out that hardly any children walked to school anymore and spent far too much time playing video games and not going outdoors and participating in physical activity. There were lots of contributions from the audience and some very strongly held views!

Finally Allison had appeared on stage and announced the names of the 6 audience members who had been selected to ask the questions! Your blogger was not selected and I must confess to feeling somewhat disappointed at that time. I shouldn't have been! Indeed, if you do get on the programme, my advice would be to hope that you don't get selected as you will then have the chance to make a contribution with much more impact than asking the actual question! Those selected to ask questions are taken aside for a very short briefing.

The recording itself!

Finally after all the rehearsals David Dimbleby and the panel appear. Prior to the recording there is a question put to the panel, which does not go out on television. This is to get the panel and the audience "into the spirit of things". On this occasion the "secret" question was about Tony Blair's decision to hire a public relations adviser to assist with his plans to re-engage in domestic UK politics. There were some lively views from both the panel and the audience! The cameras then started recording. The theme tune came on and Dimbleby introduced the panel and things then proceed as you see them on television. As you will be aware the programme lasts about an hour. The time goes over very quickly during the actual recording. Once the programme was over we had to wait until the production team had verified that the recording had went without any "hitches" and then we were free to leave! I really did not want to have to sit there and do it all again!

Are the questions "planted"?

The short answer is "no". All questions come from the audience and are selected by the production team only minutes before the panel appear. Questions can focus on news items, which break only an hour or so before the recording of the programme. That being said the questions are rather obvious and predictable. Therefore panelists' researchers won't have too many problems anticipating the topics!

Conclusion and final thoughts

My tips are simple, get to the location early, get a good seat, and don't bother participating in the question that does not go out on television! What's the point? Also, try and get on the panel for the mock debate! If you do make a contribution be prepared for Twitter reaction! I mention this in my blog post about "Guardian Reading Lawyer". If your feelings are easily hurt then don't bother speaking! You WILL be abused on Twitter and other online forums regardless of the merits (or not) of the contribution you make. That being said it is an amazing experience and one I recommend any current affairs enthusiast to try and be involved in at least once!

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Political Evictions? Be afraid, be very afraid.

I was browsing the Twitter-sphere last night and came across a right old "rumpus" about a guy being threatened with eviction from his rental property in Bow, East London. His crime? Well he was the person who exposed the Ministry of Defence's plans to site surface to air missiles on the roof of residential premises near the Olympic Park.


Forget for a moment the over the top nature of such a daft idea. Is it not something of a "coincidence" that here we have a tenant, threatened with eviction, for exercising his right in a free country to question a decision he has serious concerns about. 


Question "authority" lose your home:- think about this just for a moment!


This is not some "tinpot banana republic" this is the United Kingdom in the early 21st century! How is this possible? Well it is all down to our easy to evict Housing Laws!


The Housing Act 1988 offers no form of proper security of tenure. Tenants can be asked to leave their homes after 6 months, no reason needed. This leads to a lack of stability at a time when rented accommodation (especially in the Capital City) is at a premium and renting is now becoming the "norm". The above example is extreme and, at the time of writing, there are signs that the landlord and letting agent concerned may well be having "second thoughts". That being said every single day tenants' stability is routinely threatened by summary eviction for simple things as asking a landlord to carry out legally required repairs. As we move into the final weeks before the Olympic games there are even some reports on Twitter of landlords demanding that tenants vacate within 3 weeks!


Despite the appalling like of security of tenure tenants do have some rights. Firstly a tenant with an Assured Shorthold Tenancy CANNOT be asked to leave in 3 weeks if there is no breach of the agreement on the tenant's part. Pursuant to Section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 a Landlord must first serve written notice seeking possession. The period of this notice is a minimum of TWO MONTHS. A landlord may never simply "evict" a protected tenant. A court order is ALWAYS needed and even then a Bailiffs' Warrant of Possession must be obtained.


Any landlord breaching these strict rules faces tough civil penalties and will almost certainly be committing a criminal offence.


So whilst life in the private rented sector is indeed tough the landlords don't always have it their own way. Learn your rights and fight back!